Minier v. Mensah

District Court, S.D. New York

Minier v. Mensah

Trial Court Opinion

□□□ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | to fit we ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee eee ee ee eee ee ee eH HX a ame & — f= RAYMOND M. MINIER, et al., ‘ □ Plaintiffs, -against- a 24-cv-1311 (LAK) ALICIA K. MENSAH, et ano., Defendants = See oyna hake Se Ree BS Sore je ee eS KX

ORDER

LEwIs A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pean to

28 U.S.C. §§ 1332

, 1441 and 1446. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps _ among other things, it fails adequately to allege: 7 The nationality and citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain,

490 U.S. 826, 828

(1989); Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards,

194 U.S. 377

(1904); Leveraged ae Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc.,

87 F.3d 44

(2d Cir. 1996). O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See

28 U.S.C. § 1332

(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs.,

494 U.S. 195

(1990). O The exact nature and citizenship of one or more alleged limited liability a See Handlesman vy. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P.,

213 F.3d 48, 52

(2d Cir. 2000). Absent the filing, on or before March 5, 2024 of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 22, 2024

Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown