UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAVIER NUNEZ, Plaintiff, 24-CV-1388 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER

NICOLE FRASER, et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On October 31, 2023, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing any future civil action in this court in forma pauperis (“IFP”), without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Nunez v. Silber, ECF 1:23-CV-0625, 20 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2023), appeal pending, No. 22-7763 (2d Cir.). The Court specifically barred Plaintiff from filing any new actions IFP concerning (1) his eviction from a Manhattan apartment in 2018, and the related proceedings before the Civil Court of the City of New York, Housing Part; (2) the failure of a New York City Human Resources Administration caseworker to provide Plaintiff’s father with “services”; and (3) the failure of members of the New York City Police Department to investigate his claims of fraud and identity theft. See id.; Nunez, ECF 1:23-CV-0625, 17 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2023). On February 21, 2024, Plaintiff filed this action, pro se, seeking to proceed IFP. In the complaint, he names some of the same defendants named in Nunez, No. 23-CV-0625 and asserts the same claims asserted in that action.1 Plaintiff does not seek leave to file this new action. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to comply with the 1 This is the fourth complaint that Plaintiff has filed since the bar order was issued. See Nunez v. Fraser, ECF 1:24-CV-1115, 1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 16, 2024); Nunez v. Fraser, ECF 1:24- CV-0999, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2024); Nunez v. Fraser, ECF 1:23-CV-10750, 7 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2024). Court’s October 31, 2023 order in Nunez, ECF 1:23-CV-0625, 20. CONCLUSION The Court dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s October 31, 2023 order in Nunez, ECF 1:23-CV-0625, 20. All other pending matters in this action are terminated.

The Court warns Plaintiff that should he persist in filing frivolous, duplicative, and non- meritorious litigation, it may result in the imposition of additional sanctions, including monetary penalties. See

. The Court certifies, pursuant to

(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

(1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 28, 2024 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge