HESRCSDNG DOCUMENT ye UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SERIE CTRONSCALLY □□□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BT Sey □□□ aa wrt rrr rrr rrr rrr x Os EH tenn neta □□□□ RENELIO PEREZ, et ano., iloats raep: VSL Plaintiffs EES ee “CCR METRE TE. Oo -against- □□ ev 1000 (LAK)

RA..L ALEJANDRO OCASIO RUIZ (./k/a RAUW ALEJANDRO), et al., Defendants eee er ee er er err ee ee eee ee er ere ee ee eee HK ORDER

Lewis A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint (“FAC”) invokes subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to

.’ The Court previously dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The FAC fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction. It does not allege the nationality and citizenship of Defendant Raul Alejandro Ocasio Ruiz.’ Accordingly, the case is dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction. The Clerk shall close the case, SO ORDERED. Dated: March 12, 2024 f OT), Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge Dkt 10. Dkt 8. See Newman-Green, Inc. y. Alfonzo-Larrain,

(1989) (“In order to be a citizen of a State within the meaning of the diversity statute, a natural person must both be a citizen of the United States and be domiciled within the State.” (emphasis added)).