Washington v. Paris Production

District Court, S.D. New York

Washington v. Paris Production

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHARMEEN D. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, 24-CV-1847 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL PARIS PRODUCTION, et al., UNDER

28 U.S.C. § 1651

Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On March 4, 2024, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Washington v. Professional Claims Bureau, No. 23-CV-9592 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2024). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the March 4, 2024 order. The Court certifies, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this matter. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 14, 2024 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown