Doe v. Brisam Clinton LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Doe v. Brisam Clinton LLC

Trial Court Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: cane ccna nanan sana nnnnana DATE FILED: 3/25/24 JANE DOE, : Plaintiff, : : 23-cv-4032 (LJL) -v- : : ORDER BRISAM CLINTON LLC, et al., : Defendants. : wee KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: On May 15, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed under a pseudonym and to file her complaint under a pseudonym. Dkt. No. 5. By order of May 17, 2023, the Court permitted the filing of the complaint under pseudonym and the issuance of summons to Defendants but otherwise reserved judgment on the motion in order to permit Defendants to object. Dkt. No. 15. The Court’s memorandum and order of May 17, 2023, explained why sealing of the Plaintiff's name and identity were appropriate under the Second Circuit’s factors in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendants,

537 F.3d 185, 190

(2d Cir. 2008). On September 22, 2023, the Court entered a protective order submitted by all parties on consent that, in pertinent part, ordered that “[a]ll records relating to the action will be maintained in a manner the protects the confidentiality of the Plaintiff.’ Dkt No. 121 4 12. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Dkt. No. 5. SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 25, 2024 ee □□ New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown