Williams v. Lamanna

District Court, S.D. New York

Williams v. Lamanna

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL WILLIAMS, SSS

Petitioner, 18 CIVIL 2172 (KMK) -v- JUDGMENT

JAIME LAMANNA, Respondent. wae KX

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 25, 2024, that the R&R, dated October 11, 2023, is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED that the Petition is DISMISSED. ORDERED that because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue, see

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2); Small v. Orange Cnty. Ct., Prosecutors Off., No. 18- CV-2716,

2020 WL 1082710

, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2020) (citing Lucidore v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole,

209 F.3d 107, 11112

(2d Cir 2000)), and the Court certifies, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, Whitted v. Stallone, No. 11-CV-7569,

2016 WL 1268278

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2016) (citing Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 445

(1962)). Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 26, 2024 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: ER Deputy Clerk

Reference

Status
Unknown