Buckner v. New York Administration for Childrens Services

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHATASIA CHANEL BUCKNER, Plaintiff, 24-CV-2539 (LTS) -against- ORDER DIRECTING SIGNATURE NEW YORK ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDRENS SERVICES, et al., Defendants.

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. The complaint that Plaintiff submitted is unsigned. Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed . . . by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); see Local Civil Rule 11.1(a).

Plaintiff is directed to resubmit the signed complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. If Plaintiff returns the signed complaint by mail or in person, it must have an original signature. If submitted by email to [email protected], it must comply with the SDNY ECF Rules & Instructions and can be signed using an electronic signature in the signature block or a typed name with /s/ in the signature block (“/s/ John Doe”). A typed name that does not include “/s/” to show that it is intended to be a signature, or that is not in the signature block, is insufficient.1 The signed complaint must be labeled with the docket number 24-CV-2539 (LTS).

1 For registered ECF filers, “[t]he user log-in and password required to submit documents to the ECF system serve as the Filing User’s signature on all electronic documents filed with the Court.” Rule 8.1 of the SDNY ECF Rules & Instructions. Pro se litigants must request permission to register for ECF filing.

No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 5, 2024 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge