District Court, S.D. New York, 2024

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Robo Doors & Hardware Corp.

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Robo Doors & Hardware Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided April 15, 2024
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Robo Doors & Hardware Corp.

Trial Court Opinion

USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT : COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, : WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, and : APPRENTICESHIP, JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING, : 24 Civ. 37 (JPC) EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND, TRUSTEES : OF THE NEW YORK CITY CARPENTERS RELIEF : ORDER AND CHARITY FUND, and THE CARPENTER : CONTRACTOR ALLIANCE OF METROPOLITAN : NEW YORK, : : Petitioners, : : -v- : : ROBO DOORS & HARDWARE CORP., n/k/a ROBO : HARDWARE CORP., : : Respondent. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: On January 3, 2024, Petitioners filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award. Dkt. 1.

Petitioners served the petition on Respondent, see Dkts. 7-8, but Respondent has failed to appear.

On March 13, 2024, Petitioners filed a proposed Certificate of Default, Dkt. 9, and on the same day the Clerk of Court issued a Certificate of Default as to Respondent. Dkt. 10.

An unopposed petition to confirm an arbitration award is not, however, appropriately handled through default judgment proceedings. Instead, the Court must treat such a petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment. See D.H. Blair & Co., Inc. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109-110 (2d Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule. By on or before April 29, 2024, Respondent may file an opposition to the petition, and Petitioners’ may file a reply, if any, by on or before May 6, 2024. In the absence of any opposition from Respondent, the Court will treat the petition as an unopposed motion for summary judgment.

Finally, Petitioners are directed to serve a copy of this Order on Respondent and file proof of such service by April 19, 2024.

SO ORDERED. ha Dated: April 15, 2024 Leo 1B New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.