Megginson v. The City of New York
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL E. MEGGINSON, Plaintiff, ORDER — against — 23-cv-06798 (ER) CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.
Ramos, D.J.: Defendants’ request to stay discovery (Doc. 22 at 9) is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion presents substantial arguments for dismissal, and a stay would not unfairly prejudice Megginson.
See, e.g., HAHA Glob., Inc. v. Barclays, No. 19 Civ. 04749 (VEC) (SDA), 2020 WL 832341, at *1 (S.D.N_Y. Feb. 20, 2020). Accordingly, discovery in this matter shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to provide a copy of this order to Megginson.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 9, 2024 ye New York, New York a \ Dun EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.