Todd Albee v. Verizon New York Inc.
Todd Albee v. Verizon New York Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT KD See WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Coens JAN 0 8 2024 Ny TODD ALBEE, ee sores Ses
Plaintiff, 28-CV-551 (JLS) (HKS) v. VERIZON NEW YORK INC.,
Defendant.
DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff Todd Albee commenced an action in Supreme Court, Erie County on May 9, 2023 asserting claims against his former employer, Defendant Verizon New York Ine. (“Verizon”), for breach of contract, age discrimination, disability discrimination, negligence, prima facie tort, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. See Dkt. 1-1.! Verizon removed the action on June 16, 2028. Dkt. 1. On July 5, 2023, this Court referred the case to United States Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder for all proceedings under
28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C). Dkt. 8. On July 14, 2023, Verizon moved to dismiss. Dkt. 10. Plaintiff responded in opposition, Dkt. 14, and Defendant replied. Dkt. 16. On December 4. 2023, Judge
1 Unless otherwise noted, page references are to the numbering automatically generated by CM/ECF, which appears in the header of each page.
Schroeder issued a Report, Recommendation, and Order (‘R&R”) recommending that this Court grant Verizon’s [10] motion to dismiss. Neither party filed objections, and the time to do so has expired. A district court may accept, reject, or modify the findings or recommendations of a magistrate judge.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). A district court must conduct a de novo review of those portions of a magistrate judge's recommendation to which a party objects. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). But neither
28 U.S.C. § 636nor Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 requires a district court to review the recommendation of a magistrate judge to which no objections are raised. See Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 149-50(1985). Though not required to do so, this Court carefully reviewed the R&R and the relevant record. Based on that review, the Court accepts and adopts Judge Schroeder’s recommendation. Thus, for the reasons state above and in the R&R, this Court GRANTS Verizon's motion to dismiss and the Complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.
SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2024 Zt C) Buffalo, New York Ea □ JOHNA. SINATRA, JR OO™~S UN¥YTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown