Gonzalez v. Quadrant Capital Advisors, Inc.
Gonzalez v. Quadrant Capital Advisors, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: monn nrc nanan KK DATE FILED: 1/7/2025 MONICA GONZALEZ, : Plaintiff, : : 24-cv-6745 (LJL) -v- : : ORDER QUADRANT CAPITAL ADVISORS, INC. and CARLA : BRILLEMBOURG, : Defendants. : wee KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: On December 19, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)@). Dkt. No. 12. On January 6, 2025, the Court noted that under Second Circuit law, any settlement of a case brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act,
29 U.S.C. § 201et seq. (“FLSA”) must be scrutinized by the Court to ensure that it is fair. Dkt. No. 13 (citing Fisher v. SD Protection Inc.,
948 F.3d 593, 600 (2d. Cir. 2020); Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.,
796 F.3d 199(2d Cir. 2015)). The Court scheduled a Cheeks hearing and ordered the parties to submit a letter explaining the basis for any proposed settlement. /d. The Second Circuit has held that even where a dismissal is effected pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(), as opposed to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(11), the district court may properly inquire as to the existence of any FLSA settlement, and, if there is a FLSA settlement, the district court must then engage in a Cheeks fairness review. See Samake v. Thunder Lube, Inc.,
24 F.4th 804, 811 (2d Cir. 2022). However, “in the absence of a settlement, the notice of dismissal should be so-ordered.” Jd.
Plaintiff has informed the Court that there is no FLSA settlement. Dkt. No. 14. Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal is therefore so-ordered and the case is dismissed without prejudice and without costs. All pending deadlines and conferences are cancelled. SO ORDERED. Yo * Dated: January 7, 2025 wl IE New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown