Marino v. Siegel & Reiner, LLP

District Court, S.D. New York

Marino v. Siegel & Reiner, LLP

Trial Court Opinion

VUCUMIEIN L ELECTRONICALLY FILE DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED:_ □□□□□□□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK J. RICHARD MARINO, Plaintiff, . 1:24-cv-03041-MKV -against- SIEGEL & REINER, LLP, GLENN A. REINER, and ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD H. DEL VALLE, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 27]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by February 12, 2025. □□ □□ such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,

356 F.3d 492

, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i . . Date: January 13, 2025 vy KA Uagfene New York, NY United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown