SSTL, Inc. v. EMMA MATRATZEN, GMBH
SSTL, Inc. v. EMMA MATRATZEN, GMBH
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SSTL, INC. d/b/a EMMA MASON. Plaintiff(s), STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND - against - PROTECTIVE ORDER EMMA MATRATZEN GMBH and 24 Civ. 1505 (NRB) EMMA MATTRESS, INC., and DOES 1|- 10 Defendant(s).
NAOMI R. BUCHWALD, U.S.D.J.: WHEREAS, all the parties to this action (collectively the “Parties” and individually a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Order — including without limitation the Parties to this action (including their respective corporate parents, successors, and assigns), their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constructive notice of this Order — will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: L With respect to “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that a person (including a non- party subpoenaed in this action) has designated as “Confidential” pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as this Order #13500047v2\031749\0001
expressly permits: Des The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (“Producing Party”) may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: (a) previously non-publicly disclosed financial information (including without limitation, financial statements or summaries, profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins); (b) previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-public company; (c) previously non-disclosed business plans, product-development information, or marketing plans; (d) any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or (e) any other category of information this Court subsequently affords confidential status. a With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” by stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility. 4, A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all nissogQuase! of record, in writing, within 30 days aftey a deposition has concluded, of the specific
pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential,” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person’s counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential. 3; If at any time before the trial of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by so apprising all prior recipients in writing. Thereafter, this Court and all persons subject to this Order will treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential. 6. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence. 7. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, other persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons (a) senior management, owners, officers, directors, in-house counsel of the Parties to this action and the Parties’ employees who counsel for a Party in good faith believes reasonably needs to see the Confidential Discovery Materials and the Parties’ insurers, and counsel to their insurers; (b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter; (c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and #13500047v2\03 1749\0001
document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter; (d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto; (e) as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face of the document as having received a copy; (f) any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to testify at trial or deposition in this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto; (g) any person a Party retains to serve as an expert witness, consultant or otherwise to provide specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto; (h) stenographers and video technicians engaged to transcribe or record depositions the Parties conduct in this action; and (i) this Court, including any appellate court, its support personnel, and court reporters. 8. Before disclosing any Confidential Discovery Material to any person referred to in subparagraphs 7(d), 7(f), or 7(g) above, counsel must provide a copy of this Order to such person, who must sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto stating that he or she has read this Order and agrees to be bound by its terms. Said counsel must retain each signed Non-Disclosure Agreement and produce it to opposing counsel either
#13500047v2\03 1749\0001
before such person is permitted to testify (at deposition or trial) or at the conclusion of the case, whichever comes first. 9. In accordance with paragraph 2.E of this Court’s Individual Practices, any party filing documents under seal must simultaneously file with the Court a letter brief and supporting declaration justifying — on a particularized basis — the continued sealing of such documents. The parties should be aware that the Court will unseal documents if it is unable to make “specific, on the record findings . . . demonstrating that closure is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.” Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga,
435 F.3d 110, 120(2d Cir. 2006). 10. | The Court also retains discretion whether to afford confidential treatment to any Discovery Material designated as Confidential and submitted to the Court in connection with any motion, application, or proceeding that may result in an order and/or decision by the Court. All persons are hereby placed on notice that the Court is unlikely to seal or otherwise afford confidential treatment to any Discovery Material introduced in evidence at trial, even if such material has previously been sealed or designated as Confidential. 11. In filing Confidential Discovery Material with this Court, or filing portions of any pleadings, motions, or other papers that disclose such Confidential Discovery Material (“Confidential Court Submission”), the Parties shall publicly file a redacted copy of the Confidential Court Submission via the Electronic Case Filing System. The Parties shall file an unredacted copy of the Confidential Court Submission under seal with the Clerk of this Court, and the Parties shall serve this Court and opposing counsel with unredacted courtesy copies of the Confidential Court Submission. 12. Any Party who objects to any designation of confidentiality may at any time before the trial of this action serve upon counsel for the Producing Party a written notice stating with particularity the grounds of the objection. If the Parties cannot reach agreement promptly, #13500047v2\03 1749\0001
counsel for all affected Parties will address their dispute to this Court in accordance with paragraph 4(E) of this Court’s Individual Practices. 13. Any Party who requests additional limits on disclosure (such as “attorneys’ eyes only” in extraordinary circumstances), may at any time before the trial of this action serve upon counsel for the recipient Parties a written notice stating with particularity the grounds of the request. If the Parties cannot reach agreement promptly, counsel for all affected Parties will address their dispute to this Court in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Court’s Individual Practices, 14. Recipients of Confidential Discovery Material under this Order may use such material solely for the prosecution and defense of this action and any appeals thereto, and not for any business, commercial, or competitive purpose or in any other litigation proceeding. Nothing contained in this Order, however, will affect or restrict the rights of any Party with respect to its own documents or information produced in this action. Nothing in this Order will prevent any Party from producing any Confidential Discovery Material in its possession in response to a lawful subpoena or other compulsory process, or if required to produce by law or by any government agency having jurisdiction, provided that such Party gives written notice to the Producing Party as soon as reasonably possible, and if permitted by the time allowed under the request, at least 10 days before any disclosure. Upon receiving such notice, the Producing Party will bear the burden to oppose compliance with the subpoena, other compulsory process, or other legal notice if the Producing Party deems it appropriate to do so. 16. Each person who has access to Discovery Material designated as Confidential pursuant to this Order must take all due precautions to prevent the unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of such material.
Es 17. In addition to the terms of any applicable agreements and Court orders, the
Parties agree to abide by the obligations set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B) and Federal Rule of Evidence 502 with respect to the inadvertent production or other possession of privileged or work-product protected material. 18. If, during the course of this litigation, a Party reasonably determines that any document produced by another Party or non-party or otherwise in their possession, custody or control is potentially subject to a legally recognizable privilege or work-product protection (“Protected Document’), the Party who has such Protected Document shall: (1) refrain from reviewing the Protected Document any more closely than is necessary to ascertain that it is potentially privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure; (2) immediately notify the Producing Party in writing that it has discovered documents believed to be privileged or protected; (3) specifically identify the Protected Document(s) by either Bates number range or date, author, recipient(s) and general subject matter; and (4) within 5 days of discovery by such Party, return or destroy all copies of such Protected Document(s), along with any notes, abstracts, or compilations of the content thereof. To the extent that a Protected Document has been loaded into a litigation review database under the control of such Party, that Party shall have all electronic copies of the Protected Document extracted from the database. Where such Protected Document cannot possibly be returned or destroyed, such Protected Document shall not be reviewed, disclosed, or otherwise used by that Party. 18, If the Producing Party intends to assert a claim of privilege or other protection over documents identified by the other Party as Protected Documents, the Producing Party will promptly inform the receiving Party of such intention in writing and shall thereafter provide the receiving Party with a log for such Protected Documents that is consistent with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, setting forth the basis for the claim of privilege or other protection. In the event that a material portion of a Protected Document does not contain privileged or protected information, the Producing Party shall also provide to the other #13500047v2\031749\0001
party a redacted copy of the document that omits the information that the Producing Person believes is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection. 20. If, during the course of litigation, a Party determines that it has produced a Protected Document, the Producing Party shall notify in writing the receiving Party within 10 days of discovering that it inadvertently produced the Protected Document, and demand the return of such document. Such notice shall be in writing; however, it may be delivered orally on the record at a deposition, promptly followed up in writing. The Producing Party’s written notice will identify the Protected Document inadvertently produced by Bates number range, the privilege or protection claimed, and the basis for the assertion of the privilege and shall provide the receiving Party with a log for such Protected Documents that is consistent with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, setting forth the basis for the claim of privilege or other protection. The receiving Party must then immediately return or destroy the Protected Document and any copies, along with any notes, abstracts, or compilations of the content thereof. To the extent that a Protected Document has been loaded into a litigation review database under the control of the receiving Party, the receiving Party shall have all electronic copies of the Protected Document extracted from the database. Where such Protected Document cannot possibly be returned or destroyed, they shall not be reviewed, disclosed, or otherwise used by the receiving Party. To the extent that the information contained in a Protected Document has already been used or described in other documents generated or maintained by the receiving Party prior to the date of receipt of written notice by the Producing Party described above, then the receiving Party shall return or destroy such documents or such portion of such documents which contain information from the Producing Person until the claim has been resolved. If the receiving Party disclosed the Protected Document before being notified of its inadvertent production, it must take reasonable steps to retrieve it. 21. The receiving Party’s return or destruction of a Protected Document as #13500047v2\03 1749\0001
provided herein will not act as a waiver of the receiving Party’s right to move for the production of the returned or destroyed documents on the ground that the documents are not, in fact, subject to a viable privilege or protection. 22. Nothing contained herein is intended to, or shall, serve to limit a Party’s rights regarding the Protected Documents under applicable law. The Parties are specifically afforded the protections of Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e). ao. Within 60 days of the final disposition of this action — including all appeals —all recipients of Confidential Discovery Material must either return it — including all copies thereof — to the Producing Party, or, upon permission of the Producing Party, destroy such material — including all copies thereof. In either event, by the 60-day deadline, the recipient must certify its return or destruction by submitting a written certification to the Producing Party that affirms that it has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Confidential Discovery Material. Notwithstanding this provision, the attorneys that the Parties have specifically retained for this action may retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, expert reports, legal memoranda, correspondence, or attorney work product, even if such materials contain Confidential Discovery Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Confidential Discovery Material remain subject to this Order. 24, — This Order will survive the termination of the litigation and will continue to be binding upon all persons to whom Confidential Discovery Material is produced or disclosed.
25. This Court will retain jurisdiction over all persons subject to this Order to the extent necessary to enforce any obligations arising hereunder or to impose sanctions for any contempt thereof.
#13500047v2\031749\0001
Dated: New York, New York January 10, 2025 SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, SSTL, Inc. d/b/a Emma Mason
By:_/s/Kalpana Nagampalli Kalpana Nagampalli KI Legal 40 Wall Street, 49th Floor New York, NY 10005 (212) 404-8644 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants, Emma Matratzen GmbH and Emma Mattress, Inc.
By: /s/Fred H. Perkins Fred H. Perkins MORRISON COHEN LLP 909 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 212-736-8600 [email protected]
SO ORDERED. i ye ge C es a lh Lt DT Naomi R. Buchwald ‘ as United States District Judge / lofios
#13500047v2\031749\0001 1G
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SSTL, INC. d/b/a EMMA MASON. Plaintiff(s), NON-DISCLOSURE - against - AGREEMENT EMMA MATRATZEN GMBH and EMMA 24 Civ. 1505 (NRB) MATTRESS, INC., and DOES 1- 10 Defendant(s).
i. , acknowledge that I have read and understand the Protective Order in this action governing the non-disclosure of those portions of Discovery Material that have been designated as Confidential. I agree that I will not disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone other than for purposes of this litigation and that at the conclusion of the litigation I will return all discovery information to the Party or attorney from whom I received it. By acknowledging these obligations under the Protective Order, I understand that I am submitting myself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the purpose of any issue or dispute arising hereunder and that my willful violation of any term of the Protective Order could subject me to punishment for contempt of Court.
Name: Dated:
Reference
- Status
- Unknown