Niemeier-Wittland v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Niemeier-Wittland v. City of New York

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: BAERBEL NIEMEIER-WITTLAND, DATE FILED: Plaintiff, 24-cv-5076 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed by the Mediator that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 20]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by February 17, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,

356 F.3d 492

, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. | / lac Date: January 16, 2025 MARY VYSKOCIL New York, NY United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown