UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X PELEUS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff, ORD ER A D O PTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION -against- 24-CV-6345 (RER) (LB) CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY and BENDICT ROWLING,

Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------X RAMÓN E. REYES, JR., United States District Judge:

In a report and recommendation dated January 17, 2025, (ECF No. [25] (the “R&R”)), Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom recommended that the Court should dismiss this action against defendant Benedict Rowling without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). (Id.) Judge Bloom advised the parties that they had 14 days from the date that R&R was received to file objections. (Id.) To date, neither party has filed an objection to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Pursuant to

(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, adopts the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton,

(E.D.N.Y. 2007). As set forth more fully in the R&R, this action is dismissed against defendant Benedict Rowling without prejudice. SO ORDERED. /s/ Ramón E. Reyes, Jr. RAMÓN E. REYES, JR. United States District Judge

Dated: February 4, 2025 Brooklyn, NY