Murga v. Equity One (Northeast Portfolio), Inc.

DOCUMENT | ELECTRONICALLY FILED | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ATE FILED: 9-36 YESSIKA MURGA, ee Plaintiff, -against- 25-cv-1689 (LAK) EQUITY ONE (NORTHEAST PORFOLIO), INC., et ano., Defendants rr rr er tr erm rr tte ee eee eee eee eee eee HX ORDER LEWIs A. KAPLAN, District Judge.

Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and 1441. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: & The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996).

O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). x) The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden y. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990).

O The exact nature and citizenship of one or more alleged limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000).

Absent the filing, on or before March 10, 2025, of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 28, 2025 lu, Lewis A. Kap United States DistrictJudge