Ferrer v. Westchester Saving People

ee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \\pocu MENT LLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK eI FCTRONICA MELISSAFERRER, = 2 2=——<C—sStsSOSSS EES <4 S| = | LLED: 3 f \\ Plaintiff, DAN □ -against- 25-cv-1703 (LAK) WESTCHESTER SAVING PEOPLE, et al., Defendants tere te te mee ee ee ee ee ee er re ete te te tHe He HX ORDER LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.

Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and 1441. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: Ri The citizenship of one or more natural Loe See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996).

O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1).

O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990).

The exact nature and citizenship of one or more defendant entities.

Absent the filing, on or before March 10, 2025, of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 28, 2025 Lewis A/Kaplap .

United States District Judge