UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------- X : DAREN MAAS, : : Plaintiff, : : 23-CV-4147 (VSB) - against - : : ORDER : VERIZON NEW YORK, INC., : : Defendant. : : --------------------------------------------------------- X

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: On March 27, 2025, I ordered Plaintiff to depose four non-party witnesses in Nassau County or virtually. (Doc. 36.) Later that day, Plaintiff sought reconsideration of the order, asserting that counsel for the non-party witnesses had not fully stated Plaintiff’s reasons for conducting the depositions in person in Manhattan. (See Doc. 37.) Counsel for the witnesses responded to Plaintiff’s letter on March 28, 2025. (See Doc. 38.) I find that the new information contained in these letters warrants reconsideration of my prior order. See, e.g., Cho v. Blackberry Ltd.,

(2d Cir. 2021). Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the order dated March 27, 2025 is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties meet and confer in to attempt to resolve the dispute in good faith. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than April 3, 2025, the parties shall submit a joint letter informing me of the status of the dispute. Ifthe letter indicates the parties have not resolved the issue, I will schedule an in-person conference to resolve the matter. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 28, 2025 New York, New York , Kner Peden CAA VAIO idle Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge