District Court, S.D. New York, 2025

Donini v. Peaks

Donini v. Peaks
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided April 1, 2025
Donini v. Peaks

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHELSEA DONINI, Plaintiff, No. 22-CV-9706 (RA) v. ORDER PHILLIP PEAKS, professionally known as “PEEZY,” Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Defendant’s Local Rule 56.1 Statement, filed in support of its motion for partial summary judgment, repeatedly cites to the “Griffith Declaration.” See ECF No. 61. As Plaintiff points out, however, Defendant did not file any such declaration. See ECF No. 65. By the end of the day on April 3, 2025, Defendant shall either file this declaration or submit a letter identifying where the declaration and related exhibits have been filed on the docket. Otherwise, the Court will decide the pending motion for partial summary judgment on the record before it, disregarding any statements in the Rule 56.1 Statement that are unsupported. See Nat’l Coal. on Black Civic Participation v. Wohl, 661 F. Supp. 3d 78, 98-99 (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 1, 2025 / New York, New York J 4 _ Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.