McKinney v. Warwick New York Village Police Department

District Court, S.D. New York

McKinney v. Warwick New York Village Police Department

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USbe SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: IVAN G. MCKINNEY, DATE FILED: 4/10/2025 Plaintiff, 23-cv-10405 (NSR) -against- MEMORANDUM & ORDER WARWICK NEW YORK VILLAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL, Defendants.

NELSON S. ROMAN, United States District Judge: Pro se Plaintiff Ivan G. McKinney’s (“Plaintiff”), by application filed February 14, 2025, seeks appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 25.) Unlike in criminal proceedings, the Court does not have the power to obligate attorneys to represent indigent pro se litigants in civil cases. See Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of lowa,

490 U.S. 296, 308-09

(1989). Instead, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(1), the Court may, at its discretion, order that the Pro Se Office request an attorney to represent an indigent litigant by placing the matter on a list circulated to attorneys who are members of the Court’s pro bono panel. See Palacio v. City of New York,

489 F. Supp. 2d 335, 344

(S.D.N.Y. 2007). The Second Circuit set forth the standards governing the appointment of counsel in pro se cases in Hendricks v. Coughlin,

114 F.3d 390, 392

(2d Cir. 1997), Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co.,

877 F.2d 170, 172

(2d Cir. 1989), and Hodge v. Police Officers,

802 F.2d 58, 60-62

(2d Cir. 1986). These cases direct the district courts to “first determine whether the indigent’s position seems likely to be of substance,” Hodge,

802 F.2d at 61

, and then, if this threshold is met, to consider “secondary criteria,” including the pro se litigant’s “ability to obtain representation

independently, and his ability to handle the case without assistance in the light of the required factual investigation, the complexity of the legal issues, and the need for expertly conducted cross-examination to test veracity.” Cooper,

877 F.2d at 172

; accord Hendricks,

114 F.3d at 392

(quoting Hodge, 802 F.2d at 61–62). “Even where the claim is not frivolous, counsel is often unwarranted where the indigent’s chances of success are extremely slim,” and the Court should

determine whether the pro se litigant’s “position seems likely to be of substance,” or shows “some chance of success.” Hodge,

802 F.2d at 60-61

. The proceedings are still in their early stages, and the parties have yet to enter discovery or make dispositive motions. Thus, the Court is unable to conclude that pro se Plaintiff cannot handle the case without assistance, although this conclusion may change as the action progresses. Furthermore, the Court still cannot ascertain whether pro se Plaintiff’s position shows a strong chance of success, nor whether the legal issues in this case are particularly complex. Therefore, because the Court does not find any circumstances which warrant the appointment of pro bono counsel at this time, pro se Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED without

prejudice to renew at a later stage in the proceedings. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 25, to mail a copy of this Order to pro se Plaintiff at his address as listed on ECF and to show service on the docket. Dated: April 10, 2025 SO ORDERED: White Plains, New York

________________________________ NELSON S. ROMÁN United States District Judge 74 i) LO) em WS) P| Led a J en] eas i □□ Ramaatsmecielel a al>aam Dita a renmre)mNI-h)\'an aes BIND A) □□

ABOUT THE PROJECT The Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project (Fed Pro) provides limited assistance to self- represented litigants (plaintiffs and defendants) with cases involving civil legal matters in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY).

HOW TO SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT

To schedule an appointment for assistance with City Bar Justice [m] a = [m] Center’s Fed Pro project, you must first complete our online oi Fe ' Teas re tae Intake Form. pager ea e Our online Intake Form is accessible via one of these eee A □□ methods: i Phas o Scan the QR code to the right. 2 i □□ Go to bit.ly/prosesdny [m] Poll e Once on the City Bar Justice Center Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance page, scroll down to " "and then click " "to be taken to the Intake Form. e When the Intake Form asks: "How can we help you", please select "Federal Court Case" from the drop-down menu. The Fed Pro SDNY office will receive your application ONLY if you select "federal court case." If you select anything else, you will need to re-complete your application. Once you complete the form, someone will contact you, usually within five business days, to schedule an appointment. If you are not able to complete the Intake Form, please call (212) 382-4794, leave a detailed message, and wait for us to call you back, typically within five business days.

HOW WE HELP

mrot=) navel me] ae atel-m ali 0) f-1-1-1 one 1 a wor] □□□ 53°) 3 ode 8) ONT aT MTnaVAM=Xe btctoro) 0-1-1 a Ae Lol ne O O @Col Ui at-1-1 0 0}-a-) ole] Uhm olen -valai-l muctel-le-) Ofoy ase) WM ahmed i txexe)'.-1 a7 (ol FVinakcmo) ace) ai nl ayacien ie 2&2 Anes elas abay-ae-lele □□□ E-Taliat-mactel-lel| 22 ee □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ a= Ae eela-ssscmelerelerel area il-veiFe saclay) Mewar Alay mel haere Teli ay -4omer ale!

Reference

Status
Unknown