District Court, S.D. New York, 2025

Smith v. Carter

Smith v. Carter
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided April 16, 2025
Smith v. Carter

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RASHIDI GAMAL CARTER, Petitioner, 25-CV-3107 (LTS) -against- ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION AND ORIGINAL C. CARTER, BRONX COUNTY SUPREME SIGNATURE COMMMISSION, ET AL., Respondents.

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. To proceed with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court, a petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

Petitioner submitted the petition without the filing fee or an IFP application. Within 30 days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or complete and submit the attached IFP application. If Petitioner submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 25-CV-3107 (LTS). If the Court grants the IFP application, Petitioner will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

Furthermore, Petitioner submitted the petition without a signature. Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name – or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” See also Local Civil Rule 11.1(a). The Supreme Court has interpreted Rule 11(a) to require “as it did in John Hancock’s day, a name handwritten (or a mark handplaced).” Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 764 (2001).

Petitioner is therefore also directed to resubmit the signature page of the petition with an original signature to the Court within 30 days of the date of this order. A copy of the signature page is attached to this order.

No answer shall be required at this time. If Petitioner complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Petitioner fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

CONCLUSION The Court directs Petitioner, within thirty days, to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or complete and submit the attached IFP application. The Court further directs Petitioner, within 30 days, to resubmit the signature page of the petition with an original signature to the Court.

If Petitioner fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

Because the petition makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 16, 2025 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.