Irving v. Kopp
Irving v. Kopp
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ERROL IRVING, Petitioner, 25-CV-3315 (LTS) -against- TRANSFER ORDER MARLYN KOPP, Respondent. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Petitioner, who is currently incarcerated at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, brings this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2254challenging the constitutionality of his 2017 conviction in the New York Supreme Court, Kings County. Because Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in Kings County, which is located in the Eastern District of New York, the Court transfers this action, under Local Civil Rule 83.3, to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Whether Petitioner may be permitted to proceed further without payment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court.1 This order closes this case in this court. Because Petitioner has not at this time made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue under
28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an
1 Petitioner did not submit an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: April 22, 2025 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown