Doe v. Noem

District Court, S.D. New York

Doe v. Noem

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX JANE DOE, : Plaintiff, : : 25 Civ. 3365 (JPC) -V- : : ORDER KRISTI NOEM, et al., : Defendants. :

KX JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Jane Doe filed the Complaint in this action under a pseudonym. See Dkt. 1. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10 requires that “[t]he title of the complaint must name all the parties.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff may not proceed pseudonymously unless she first seeks and receives permission from this Court to do so. See Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant,

537 F.3d 185, 189

(2d Cir. 2008). If Plaintiff does not file a motion seeking leave to appear by pseudonym by May 2, 2025, the Court will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice and without further notice. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 28, 2025 Wf New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown