Smith v. Westhb Traverse House
Smith v. Westhb Traverse House
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□ KEVIN A. SMITH, Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 4961 (KMW) JUDGMENT WESTHAB TRAVERSE HOUSE, et al., Defendants.
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated June 4, 2025, the Court has dismissed Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed IFP under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i1). The Court has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims Plaintiff may be asserting. See 28 U.S.C.§ 1367(c)(3). The Court certifies under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). Dated: New York, New York June 5, 2025
TAMMI M. HELLWIG
Clerk of Court BY: HK MANGE Deputy Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unknown