Frost v. Biden
Frost v. Biden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VINTON FROST, Plaintiff, 1:25-CV-4271 (LTS) -against- JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official ORDER OF DISMISSAL capacity as 46th President of the United States UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651of America, Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated October 4, 2022, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing any future civil action in this court in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Frost v. Trump, ECF 1:22-CV-6126, 8 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2022). Plaintiff files this new pro se civil action,1 seeks IFP status,2 and has not sought leave to file from the Court. The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the October 4, 2022 order in Frost, ECF 1:22-CV-6126, 8. The Court certifies, under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962)
1 Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF 1) and consent to electronic service of court documents (ECF 2) are both unsigned. 2 Plaintiff has neither paid the fees to bring this action, nor filed an IFP application. Because he has not paid the fees, however, the Court understands that he is seeking to proceed IFP. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment dismissing this action for the reason set forth in this order. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2025 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown