Singh v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
Singh v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
Trial Court Opinion
GRANITE. Lhe Court has determined that the proposed □□□□□□□ MEMY ENVURORL are narrowly tailored to serve the purpose of preserving the confidentiality of settlement discussions before the SDNY Mediati Honorable Jeannette A. Vargas Program and are otherwise consistent with the presumption in □□□ public access to judicial documents. See, e.g., Lugosch v. Pyramid | United States District Judge Onondaga,
435 F.3d 110, 119-20(2d Cir. 2006). no The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 52. United States District Court, SDNY SO ORDERED. . 500 Pearl Street ~~ Date: 6/13 ~S tamnllé Vi id) New York, NY 10007 HON. JEANNETTE A. V cd AS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Re: Harinder Jeet Singh v. Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, Civil Action No. 23-cv-9846 (JAV) Plaintiff Singh’s reply to Defendant’s letter motion to redact/seal settlement discussions during Pretrial Conference dated May 21, 2025 from the transcript. Plaintiff Singh with due respect submit the following: Singh revealed the settlement discussions at the said conference as the Defendant intentionally does not want to settle the case. Singh was open to a very reasonable settlement but the Defendant was not serious about the settlement. Singh opposes the redaction of the settlement discussion part from the transcript but leave this to the court in whatever way it decides on the said issue. Respectfully Submitted, Wi Singh, Dated: 6/11/25 P. O. Box- 721025, Jackson Heights, New York 11372 Email: [email protected]
Reference
- Status
- Unknown