UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICCODSLADE, SS

Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 514 (IMF) JUDGMENT CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. eee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated June 18, 2025, Defendants’ motions to dismiss must be and are GRANTED. Further, the Court declines to sua sponte grant Slade leave to amend. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants and the case 1s closed. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to

(a)(3), that any appeal from this Memorandum Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith and in forma pauperis status is thus denied. See Coppedge v. United States,

(1962). Dated: New York, New York June 20, 2025

TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court

BY: ( Dube Deputy Clerk