Topp v. Pincus

District Court, S.D. New York

Topp v. Pincus

Trial Court Opinion

Application GRANTED. Tashikan Corp. is permitted to intervene under Rule 24(b). Tashikan Corp.'s interest in the apartment property at issue “shares with the main action a common question of law," and the intervention will not "unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the Ronald D. Coleman original parties’ rights" because Tashikan Corp. and the original parties COLEMAN LAW FIRM, PC have a similar interest in the sale of the apartment property. Extenet Sys. 50 Park Place, Suite 1105 LLC. v. Viii. of Kings Point, No. 22-1265,

2023 WL 4044076

, at *1 (2d Cir. Newark, NJ 07102 June 16, 2023) (summary order). Moreover, no party has objected to 973-264-9611 Tashikan Corp.'s motion to intervene. The Clerk of Court is respectfully [email protected] _ directed to close the motion at Dkt. No. 117. Attorneys for Intervenor Tashikan Corp. Dated: July 8, 2025 New York, New York LORNA G, SCHOFIEL SYLVIA TOPP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE | Case 1:20-cv-10016 Plaintiff, VS. ! HARRY PINCUS and MONICA PINCUS, Defendants. !

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that upon the accompanying declaration and memorandum of law, applicant Tashikan Corp. will, at a date and time to be determined by the Court, move the Court for an Order permitting intervention pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24.

COLEMAN LAW FIRM, PC

RONALD D. COLEMAN Dated: June 13, 2025

Reference

Status
Unknown