Global Media Network v. Tidal
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GLOBAL MEDIA NETWORK, Plaintiff, 25-CV-5675 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL TIDAL, Defendant.
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff Global Media Network filed this action pro se. Non-party William Scales signed the complaint but did not pay the $405.00 in fees to initiate a new civil action or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). For the reasons set forth in this order, the Court dismisses the claims asserted by Global Media Network without prejudice.
To proceed with a civil action in this court, a plaintiff must either pay $405.00 in fees—a $350.00 filing fee plus a $55.00 administrative fee—or, request authorization to proceed IFP, that is, without prepayment of fees, by submitting a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Only a natural person, however, can proceed IFP; an entity like Plaintiff Global Media Network cannot. See Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 196 (1993) (holding that only natural persons may proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915).
Moreover, an entity like Global Media Network cannot proceed without counsel. See, e.g., Jones v. Niagara Frontier Transp. Auth., 722 F.2d 20, 22 (2d Cir. 1983) (noting that “it is established that a corporation, which is an artificial entity that can only act through agents, cannot proceed pro se”).
Accordingly, the Court dismisses Global Media Network’s claims without prejudice to that entity proceeding with this action with counsel and with the payment of the fees.
CONCLUSION The Court dismisses Global Media Network’s claims without prejudice to this entity proceeding with this action with counsel and with the payment of the fees.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal.
See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).
The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this action.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 23, 2025 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.