UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOUGLAS DUFFIE, Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE “against: 25=CV-5170 (PMH) C.0. JHON TIBURCIORUIZ, Defendant. PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who currently is incarcerated at Upstate Correctional Facility, brings this action, pro se, under

, alleging that Defendant subjected him to excessive force. By order dated July 23, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees..' (Doc. 8). A. Order of service Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.2 Walker v. Schult,

, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also

(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process... in [IFP] cases.”’); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendant through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form

' Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See

(b)(1). 2 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have effected service until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that any summons be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date any summons issues.

(“USM-285 form’’) for Defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendant. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summons is issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong,

(2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. B. Local Rule 33.2 Local Civil Rule 33.2, which requires defendants in certain types of prisoner cases to respond to specific, court-ordered discovery requests, applies to this action. Those discovery requests are available on the Court’s website under “Forms” and are titled “Plaintiff’s Local Civil Rule 33.2 Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents.” Within 120 days of service of the complaint, Defendants must serve responses to these standard discovery requests. In their responses, Defendants must quote each request verbatim. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons for Defendant, complete the USM-285 form with the address for Defendant, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff.

3 Tf Plaintiff would like copies of these discovery requests before receiving the responses and does not have access to the website, Plaintiff may request them from the Pro Se Intake Unit.

Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies to this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 24, 2025 White Plains, New York (Grun./ PHILIP M. HALPERN United States District Judge

SERVICE ADDRESS FOR DEFENDANT

Corrections Officer “Jhon” Tiburcioruiz Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562