Alhalemi v. City University of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X : BASHIR ALHALEMI, : : Plaintiff, : 24 Civ. 6975 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, : : Defendant. : : -------------------------------------------------------------X LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on October 18, 2024, Plaintiff moved for leave to file an Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, on January 10, 2025, the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Robyn F.

Tarnofsky; WHEREAS, on March 25, 2025, Defendant filed its motion to dismiss the original Complaint; WHEREAS, on April 2, 2025, Judge Tarnofsky granted Plaintiff’s request to file an Amended Complaint as of right; WHEREAS, on April 23, 2025, Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, on May 5, 2025, Judge Tarnofsky issued a Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) recommending that Plaintiff’s motion to amend his Complaint and Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint be denied as moot because Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, as stated in Judge Tarnofsky’s Report, the deadline for filing any objections was fourteen days from service of the Report; WHEREAS, no objections were timely filed; WHEREAS, in reviewing a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). “In a case such as this one, where no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Kuan vy. Notoriety Grp. LLC, No. 22 Civ. 1583, 2023 WL 3936749, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 9, 2023); WHEREAS, the Court finds no clear error on the face of the record as to Judge Tamofsky’s Report. It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Report is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion to amend his Complaint is DENIED as moot. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint is also DENIED as moot.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions at Dkt. Nos. 12 and 37.

Dated: July 29, 2025 New York, New York UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE