UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ______________________________________________ JESSIE ENGLES, a/k/a Jesse Engles, Plaintiff, 9:23-CV-1056 v. (GTS/DJS) BRANDI CORIGLIANO, N.P., Marcy Corr. Fac.; HAMMAD U. RAHMAN, M.D., Upstate SUNY Med. Ctr. Hosp.; DINELLO, Facility Health Svcs. Dir./ Physician, Auburn Corr. Fac.; SHEHAB ZAKI, Physician, Marcy Corr. Fac.; and CHANGLAI, Physician, Upstate SUNY Med. Ctr. Hosp., Defendants. ______________________________________________ APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: JESSIE ENGLES, 22-B-1293 Plaintiff, Pro Se Clinton Correctional Facility P.O. Box 2001 Dannemora, New York 12929 SUGARMAN LAW FIRM ALEXANDRA A. CALHOUN, ESQ. Counsel for Defendant Changlai ZACHARY MATTISON, ESQ. 211 West Jefferson Street Syracuse, New York 13202 HON. LETITIA JAMES AIMEE COWAN, ESQ. New York State Attorney General Assistant Attorney General Counsel for Defendants Corigliano, Dinello, and Zaki 300 South State Street, Suite 300 Syracuse, New 13202 GLENN T. SUDDABY, United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Currently before the Court, in this pro se prisoner civil rights action filed by Jessie Engles (“Plaintiff”) against Dr. Zaki and Nurse Practitioner Corigliano of Marcy Correctional Facility, Dr. Dinello of Auburn Correctional Facility, and Drs. Rahman and Changlai of Upstate SUNY Medical Center Hospital (“Defendants”), is United States Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart’s Report-Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 68) be

stricken for failure to comply with Local Rule 15.1 of the Local Rules of Practice for this Court, and that Defendant Changlai’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 75) be denied as moot. (Dkt. No. 77.) Plaintiff has not filed an Objection to the Report-Recommendation, and the time in which to do so has expired. (See generally Docket Sheet.) After carefully reviewing the relevant papers herein, including Magistrate Judge Stewart’s thorough Report-Recommendation, the Court can find no clear error in the Report- Recommendation:1 Magistrate Judge Stewart employed the proper standards, accurately recited

the facts, and reasonably applied the law to those facts. As a result, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Stewart’s Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 77) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 68) be STRICKEN; and it is

1 When no objection is made to a report-recommendation, the Court subjects that report-recommendation to only a clear error review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes: 1983 Addition. When performing such a “clear error” review, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Id.; see also Batista v. Walker, 94-CV-2826,

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 1995) (Sotomayor, J.) (“I am permitted to adopt those sections of [a magistrate judge’s] report to which no specific objection is made, so long as those sections are not facially erroneous.”) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2 further ORDERED that Defendant Changlai’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 75) is DENIED as moot. Dated: November 5, 2025 Syracuse, New York Glenn T. Suddaby U.S. District Judge