Andre Antrobus v. New York City; New York State

District Court, S.D. New York

Andre Antrobus v. New York City; New York State

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiffs, -against- 25 CIVIL 3338 (KMW) JUDGMENT NEW YORK CITY; NEW YORK STATE, Defendants. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 15, 2025, the Court has denied Andre Antrobus’s request to proceed IFP, and has dismissed his claims without prejudice under the PLRA’s “three- strikes” rule. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g). Antrobus remains barred from filing any future action IFP while he is in custody, unless he is under imminent threat of serious physical injury. The Court has dismissed without prejudice the claims brought by Brian Guzman, under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Court certifies under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). Dated: New York, New York September 16, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: □ MMANgo Deputy Clerk

Reference

Status
Unknown