Krystle Umpierre v. HRS Transport, Inc., et ano.
Krystle Umpierre v. HRS Transport, Inc., et ano.
Trial Court Opinion
HUSDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i} D ate MENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK i\ ane eee eee eee ee eee eee eee □□□ -- ELECTRONICALLY FILED KRYSTLE UMPIERRE, DOC #: DATE FILED: Plaintiff, all
-against- 25-cv-7631 (LAK)
HRS TRANSPORT, INC., et ano., Defendants. ee we eee ee ee eee ee ee ee ee eee eee eee HH KH HX
ORDER
Lewis A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1332and 1441. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: a The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards,
194 U.S. 377(1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc.,
87 F.3d 44(2d Cir. 1996). O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See
28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). Oo The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs.,
494 U.S. 195(1990). Oo The exact nature and citizenship of one or more alleged limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P.,
213 F.3d 48, 52(2d Cir. 2000). Absent the filing, on or before September 26, 2025 of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 19/2025 Lewis A. n United States District Indge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown