Frangie Espinal, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated...
Frangie Espinal, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated...
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
FRANGIE ESPINAL, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. 25-cv-2203 (RA)
y ORDER SPLINTEK INC., Defendants.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same forty-five-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,
791 F.3d 354, 358(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 18, 2025 New York, New York Ui] / hi Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Frangie Espinal, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated v. Splintek Inc.
- Status
- Unknown