USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED THE ABRAMSON LAW GROUP, PLLC, DOC #: DATE FILED: 10/6/2025 Plaintiff, -against- 24 Civ. 5750 (AT) CARDEA CAPITAL GROUP, INC., ORDER CARDEA CORPORATE HOLDINGS, INC. AND CARDEA HOLDINGS USA, LLC, Defendants. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter dated September 26, 2025 regarding a post-judgment discovery dispute between the parties. ECF No. 79. Defendants have appealed from this Court’s September 9, 2025 order, which dismissed Plaintiff's claims as to Defendant Cardea Capital Advisor for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denied Defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment as to the remaining three Defendants. See ECF Nos. 77—78; see also ECF No. 60 (entry of default). “A default judgment is a final action by the district court in the litigation and one that may be appealed,” City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC,

(2d Cir. 2011) (cleaned up), as is a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, see Barclay's Ice Cream Co. v. Loc. No. 757 of Ice Cream Drivers & Emps. Union, No. 79 Civ. 1611,

, at *2 (S.D.N_Y. Sept. 7, 1979). The Court is, therefore, divested of jurisdiction. See United States v. Rodgers,

(2d Cir. 1996). Accordingly, post-judgment discovery is STAYED pending Defendants’ appeal. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 6, 2025 New York, New York ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge