District Court, S.D. New York, 2025

James Pettus v. Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe; Andrew Barnes

James Pettus v. Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe; Andrew Barnes
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided October 17, 2025
James Pettus v. Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe; Andrew Barnes

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES PETTUS, Plaintiff, 25-CV-7205 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE; ANDREW UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 BARNES, Defendants.

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On February 4, 2005, the court barred Plaintiff James Pettus from filing future civil actions in this court without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Pettus v. Clarke, No. No. 05-CV-1439, 5 (MBM) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2005) (electronic docket entry), appeal dismissed as frivolous, No. 05-1314 (2d Cir. Sept. 29, 2005) (electronic docket entry). Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this new civil action seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but he has not sought leave from the court to file this action. The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice, due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the February 4, 2005 judgment in Pettus, No. 05-CV-1439, 5.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this action.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 17, 2025 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.