District Court, S.D. New York, 2025

Darri D. Woodhouse v. Neiman-Marcus White Plains New York, et al.

Darri D. Woodhouse v. Neiman-Marcus White Plains New York, et al.
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided October 23, 2025
Darri D. Woodhouse v. Neiman-Marcus White Plains New York, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DARRI D. WOODHOUSE, Plaintiff, 1:25-CV-6499 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL NEIMAN-MARCUS WHITE PLAINS NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated August 14, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff, within 30 days, to resubmit the signature pages of his complaint, in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application, and prisoner authorization with original signatures. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff has not submitted the signed signature pages. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a).

The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment dismissing this action for the reason set forth in this order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 23, 2025 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.