Amari J. Moody v. Starbucks Corporation
Amari J. Moody v. Starbucks Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMARI J. MOODY, Plaintiff, 25 Civ. 8739 (PAE) -against- ORDER OF SERVICE STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Family Medical Leave Act, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). She alleges that her employer discriminated against her based on her disability. Dkt. 1. By order dated October 23, 2025, the Court granted plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees. Dkt. 6. Because plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, she is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.! Walker v. Schult,
717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process ... in [IFP] cases.”’); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (a court must order the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service if the plaintiff authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow plaintiff to effect service on defendant, Starbucks Corporation, through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process
‘Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have effected service until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that any summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date any summonses issue.
Receipt and Return form (““USM-285 form”) for defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service upon defendant. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summons is issued, plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong,
682 F.3d 56, 63(2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if her address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if plaintiff fails to do so. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is instructed to issue a summons for defendant, complete the USM- 285 form with the address for defendant, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail an information package to plaintiff. Plaintiff may receive court documents by email by completing the attached, Consent to Electronic Service.” SO ORDERED. Dated: October 29, 2025 New York, New York Funk A { pol / y
United States District Judge
* If plaintiff consents to receive documents by email, plaintiff will no longer receive court documents by regular mail.
SERVICE ADDRESS FOR DEFENDANT
Starbucks Corporation 2401 Utah Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98134
CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE I hereby consent to receive electronic service of notices and documents in my case(s) listed below. I affirm that: 1. I have regular access to my e-mail account and to the internet and will check regularly for Notices of Electronic Filing; 2. I have established a PACER account; 3. I understand that electronic service is service under Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 5.2 of the Local Civil Rules, and that I will no longer receive paper copies of case filings, including motions, decisions, orders, and other documents; 4. I will promptly notify the Court if there is any change in my personal data, such as name, address, or e-mail address, or if I wish to cancel this consent to electronic service; 5. I understand that I must regularly review the docket sheet of my case so that I do not miss a filing; and 6. I understand that this consent applies only to the cases listed below and that if I file additional cases in which I would like to receive electronic service of notices of documents, I must file consent forms for those cases. Civil case(s) filed in the Southern District of New York: Please list all your pending and terminated cases to which you would like this consent to apply. For each case, include the case name and docket number (for example, John Doe v. New City, 10- CV-01234).
Name (Last, First, MI)
Address City State Zip Code
Telephone Number E-mail Address
Date Signature
Click Here to Save
Reference
- Status
- Unknown