UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x GAYLON TESLAA d/b/a ALPEN PET : HOSPITAL, et al., : Plaintiffs, : ORDER v. :

: 25-CV-06991 (PMH) VEREUCK PROPERTIES LLC, et al., : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------x

PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge:

On September 3, 2025, the Court issued an order transferring this matter to the Eastern District of California. (Doc. 4). According to the docket, this action was transferred electronically, and the Eastern District of California acknowledged receipt of transferred case on September 18, 2025. On October 29, 2025, Plaintiffs filed seven affirmations of service (Docs. 8-14); a declaration “in support of motion to reconsider transfer order and right to self counsel” (Doc. 15), a “motion to recognize real party in interest under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a) (Doc. 16); a “notice of party realignment and clarification of capacity” (Doc. 17); an “affidavit of the truth” (Doc. 18); and an affidavit “regarding use of the language of correct parse quantum grammar” (Doc. 19). “Following the proper transfer of a case from one district to another . . ., the transferor court loses all jurisdiction over the case.” In re Nw. Airlines Corp., Nos. 05-CV-17930, 07-CV-2677,

, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2008). “Generally, a decision transferring a case can only be reconsidered or appealed through a writ of mandamus if the petitioner acts ‘prior to receipt of the action’s papers by the clerk of the transferee court[ ] . . . .’” Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc., No. 10-CV-05713,

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 3, 2011) (quoting In re Warrick,

(2d Cir. 1995) (alteration in original). Thus, even if Plaintiffs had properly and timely moved for reconsideration of the transfer order—which they did not—this Court has no jurisdiction over this case to consider any of Plaintiffs’ applications since the receipt of the action’s papers by the Eastern District of California court. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion (Doc. 16).

SO ORDERED: Dated: White Plains, New York October 31, 2025 Philip M. Halpern” United States District Judge