Marquis Jovan Ventura v. James William Magee, Officer of the Court; Beth...
Marquis Jovan Ventura v. James William Magee, Officer of the Court; Beth...
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARQUISJOVANVENTURA, Plaintiff, -against- 25 CIVIL 5098 (KMW) JUDGMENT JAMES WILLIAM MAGEE, Officer of the Court; BETH BELLER, District Court Judge; SARA LITMAN, District Court Judge, Defendants. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated November 2, 2025, the Court has denied Plaintiffs request for appointment of counsel, and has declined to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction of any state- law claims Plaintiff may be asserting.
28 U.S.C. § 1367. Because the petition makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies, under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). Dated: New York, New York November 4, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court
‘Deputy Clerk
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Marquis Jovan Ventura v. James William Magee, Officer of the Court; Beth Beller, District Court Judge; Sara Litman, District Court Judge
- Status
- Unknown