Kenyetta Wallace v. United States Constitution
Kenyetta Wallace v. United States Constitution
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KENYETTA WALLACE, Plaintiff, 25-CV-9148 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On April 2, 2018, then-Chief Judge Colleen McMahon barred Plaintiff Kenyetta Wallace from filing any new civil action in this court in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Zepporah Reign v. The Crown Office, ECF 1:17-CV-9985, 7 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2018), appeal dismissed as frivolous, No. 18-1319 (2d Cir. Nov. 14, 2018); see also
id.,ECF 1:17-CV-9985, 3 (document filed by “Heiress Kenyetta T. Zepporah Reign” identifying herself as Kenyetta Wallace). Plaintiff files this new action pro se, seeking IFP status. Plaintiff has not sought leave to bring this action. The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the April 2, 2018 bar order in Zepporah Reign, ECF 1:17-CV-9985, 7. The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). Judgment shall enter. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 4, 2025 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown