Zama Capital Advisors LP, et al. v. Universal Entertainment Corporation, et al.

District Court, S.D. New York

Zama Capital Advisors LP, et al. v. Universal Entertainment Corporation, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x ZAMA CAPITAL ADVISORS LP, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : 24-CV-1577 (MKV) (OTW) -against- : : ORDER UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, : et al., : : Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: It has come to the Court’s attention that Defendants did not file ECF 186, a motion to seal based on Plaintiffs’ anticipated designation of information within it as confidential, as a joint motion with Plaintiffs in compliance with my Individual Rules and Practices. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are directed to respond to ECF 186 by November 14, 2025, or ECF 186 will be denied as moot. If Plaintiffs seek sealing of ECF Nos. 187 and 188, they must articulate their reasons for sealing in accordance with Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga,

435 F.3d 110

(2d Cir. 2006) and Bernstein v. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP,

814 F.3d 132

(2d Cir. 2016).

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: November 5, 2025 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown