District Court, S.D. New York, 2025

Technology Holdings Worldwide, Inc. v. Lumari Capital, LLC

Technology Holdings Worldwide, Inc. v. Lumari Capital, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided November 13, 2025
Technology Holdings Worldwide, Inc. v. Lumari Capital, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS WORLDWIDE, INC., Plaintiff, 25-CV-07717 (JAV) (RFT) -against- ORDER LUMARI CAPITAL, LLC, Defendant.

ROBYN F. TARNOFSKY, United States Magistrate Judge: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within 30 days of the service of the amended summons and complaint, Plaintiff and Defendant must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. In their discussions, the parties should consider whether Plaintiff has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing. See, e.g., Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd., 36 F.4th 68, 77-78 (2d Cir. 2022); Harty v. W. Point Realty, Inc., 28 F.4th 435, 443-44 (2d Cir. 2022). To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the District’s Court-annexed mediation program or in a settlement conference before the undersigned would be productive at this time.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 45 days of the service of the amended summons and complaint, the parties must submit a joint letter informing the Court whether the parties have settled. If the parties do not reach a settlement, the parties shall, in their joint letter, request that the Court either: (1) refer the case to mediation, (2) set a date for a settlement conference, or (3) proceed with an initial case management conference.

DATED: November 13, 2025 New York, NY SO Wp ROBYN F. TARNOFSKY United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.