Razwan Miah v. Synapse Medical Communications, LLC, et al.

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT eae aaa SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK poc 4.

DATE FILED: 11/17/2025 RAZWAN MIAH, Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING -V- SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE SYNAPSE MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, ET AL., 24-CV-3330 (HJR) Defendants.

HENRY J. RICARDO, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case is an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seg. (“FLSA”), which is before this Court on the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

The Court has received the parties’ joint letter request that the Court approve their settlement agreement, a fully executed copy of which was submitted on July 25, 2025. ECF Nos. 30, 31-1. The Court also has Plaintiffs retainer agreement, the parties’ supplemental letter, dated October 31, 2025, which amended paragraph 6 of the settlement agreement (entitled “Release of Claims by Defendant”), and contemporaneous time records for Plaintiff's counsel. ECF Nos. 30-2, 35, 35-1. A federal court is obligated to determine whether settlement of an FLSA case under the court’s consideration is fair and reasonable and the subject of an arm’s length negotiation, not an employer’s overreaching. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015).

The Court has carefully reviewed the Settlement Agreement as well as the parties’ letter. The Court has taken into account, without limitation, prior proceedings in this action; the attendant risks, burdens, and costs associated with continuing the action; the range of possible recovery; whether the Settlement Agreement is the product of arm’s length bargaining between experienced counsel or parties; the amount of attorney’s fees; and the possibility of fraud or collusion.

Among other attributes of the Settlement Agreement, there are no confidentiality restrictions; the release, as amended by the parties’ October 31, 2025 letter to the Court, ECF No. 35, while general, is now mutual in scope; and the attorney’s fees are within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range. Considering all the circumstances, the Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fair and reasonable, and it is hereby approved.

This case, having resolved by settlement, is hereby dismissed and discontinued in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party, except as provided for in the Settlement Agreement.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate all motions and deadlines, and to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 17, 2025 New York, New York ChL Henry. Ricard United States Migistrate Judge