District Court, S.D. New York, 2025

Yuri Hovhannisyan ex rel. C.A.R.C. v. “HAYNES,” Warden of Detention Faility At...

Yuri Hovhannisyan ex rel. C.A.R.C. v. “HAYNES,” Warden of Detention Faility At...
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided November 19, 2025
Yuri Hovhannisyan ex rel. C.A.R.C. v. “HAYNES,” Warden of Detention Faility At...

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED Yuri Hovhannisyan ex rel. C.A.R.C., DOC #: DATE FILED: __ 11/19/2025 Petitioner, —— -against- “HAYNES,” Warden of Detention Faility At Federal Plaza, New York, NY; Todd Lyons, Acting Director of U.S. Immigraiton And Customs Enforcement; Marcos Charles acting Executive Associate Director for ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO); 25 Civ. 9520 (AT) William P. JOYCE, in his official capacity as Deputy Field Office Director of new York; ORDER OF DISMISSAL Rodney S. SCOTT, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP); Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Kristi NOEM, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; and Pamela BONDI, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, in their official capacities, Respondents.

ANALISA TORRES, United States District Judge: On November 17, 2025, the Court received a letter from Petitioner’s mother, acting on Petitioner’s behalf, advising that Petitioner and their counsel wish to withdraw the petition at ECF No. 1. See ECF No. 7. The Court GRANTS the request to withdraw this action. The complaint is voluntarily dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).' The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

SO ORDERED. □□ Dated: November 19, 2025 New York, New York ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge ' A voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) is without prejudice. “But if the plaintiff previously dismissed any federal- or state-court action based on or including the same claim, a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.