District Court, S.D. New York, 2025

Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach, Inc., et al.

District Court, S.D. New York · Decided November 20, 2025

Trial Court Opinion

fil NELSON MULLINS MEMO ENDORSED Erika C. Birg \\ M () T (404) 322-6110 □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ HON. VALERIE FIGUER .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIA ECF Dated: November 20, 2025 A oo. □ □□ The Honorable Lorna Schofield ny party who maintains that Case-Mate's exhibit . ae should remain sealed should file a letter supportin Judge, United States District Court . . □□ sealing pursuant to Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) by United States Courthouse November 26, 2025. If no such motion is made, t Foley Square exhibits will be unsealed.

New York, NY 10007 RE: Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-05138-LGS Case-Mate’s Letter Motion to Seal Dear Judge Schofield: Pursuant to Rule I.D.3 of Your Honor’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases, Case-Mate, Inc. (“Case-Mate”) respectfully requests Your Honor’s approval to file under seal Exhibits A, B, E, and I to Case-Mate’s Pre-Motion Letter Requesting a Conference [ECF 952].

Case-Mate seeks to seal these exhibits because other parties marked these documents or testimony in discovery as either “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential-Attorney Eyes Only” under the Stipulation and Confidentiality Agreement and Order [ECF 233] (the “Confidentiality Stipulation’). To ensure compliance with the Confidentiality Stipulation, Exhibits A, B, E, and I are submitted with this Letter Motion to Seal for the Court’s consideration. They are not attached to ECF 952.

Case-Mate takes no position on whether these documents satisfy the criteria for sealing.

Case-Mate is separately serving the Pre-Motion Letter and this Letter. with attendant exhibits, on opposing counsel by email. We thank the Court for its attention to this matter.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.