Christopher Miller v. United States
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Petitioner, 20 CIVIL 4193 (SHR)\OTW) -against- JUDGMENT CHRISTOPHER MILLER, Respondent. wenn eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated November 20, 2025, the Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation in any event and, unguided by objections, finds no clear error. The Report and Recommendation 1s “well-reasoned and grounded in fact and law.” See, e.g., Fredricks, 2025 WL 1018870, at *1. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, accordingly, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); see also, e.g., Matthews v. United States, 682 F.3d 180, 185 (2d Cir. 2012). In addition, this Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).
Dated: New York, New York November 24, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: HK Mange DeputyClerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.