District Court, N.D. New York, 2026

Melvin Johnson v. N.Y.S. Division of Parole, et al.

Melvin Johnson v. N.Y.S. Division of Parole, et al.
District Court, N.D. New York · Decided January 27, 2026
Melvin Johnson v. N.Y.S. Division of Parole, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MELVIN JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 9:24-cv-167 (ECC/ML) v. N.Y.S. DIVISION OF PAROLE, et al., Defendants.

Appearances: Melvin Johnson, Pro Se Plaintiff Susanna M. Klose, Asst. Att’y Gen., for Defendant N.Y.S. Division of Parole James A. Long, Esq., for Defendant Cayuga County Hon. Elizabeth C. Coombe, United States District Judge: MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff Melvin Johnson commenced this action pro se, asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. On May 16, 2025, Defendant Cayuga County (the County) filed a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) seeking to dismiss the amended complaint. Dkt. No. 62.

Plaintiff filed an opposition to the County’s motion. Dkt. No. 66. This matter was assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric who, on September 25, 2025, issued a Report- Recommendation and Order recommending that the County’s motion to dismiss be denied. Dkt.

No. 81. Magistrate Judge Lovric advised the parties that under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days within which to file written objections to the report and that the failure to object to the report within fourteen days would preclude appellate review. Dkt. No. 81 at 17. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.

As no objection to the Report-Recommendation has been filed, and the time for filing objections has expired, the Court reviews the Report-Recommendation for clear error. See Petersen v. Astrue, 2 F. Supp. 3d 223, 228-29 (N.D.N.Y. 2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 amendment.

Having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and found none, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation in its entirety.

WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Lovric’s Report-Recommendation, Dkt. No. 81, is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant Cayuga County’s motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 62, is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2026 fa Elizabeth C. Coombe U.S. District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.