New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1906

In re Exceptions of Veasey

In re Exceptions of Veasey
New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Decided April 12, 1906 · Lore
22 Del. 52; 6 Penne. 52; 63 A. 801; 1906 Del. LEXIS 21

Counsel

C. W. Cullen and R. C. White for applicant., Robert G. Houston and Henry B. Freeney (of the Maryland Bar) for exceptants.

In re Exceptions of Veasey

Opinion of the Court

Lore, C. J.:

The statute (Chap. 418, Sec. 4, Vol. 14, Laws of Delaware—Rev. Code, 413) requires that the applicant for a license to sell intoxicating liquor shall present a petition with certain recommendations and that each person signing said recommendation must either have read it himself or have had the same read to him. That is the positive mandate of the law. As the evidence before us discloses that the petition was not read to or read by each of the signers to the same, we hold that the law has not been complied with, that the certificate is void, and we therefore refuse the license on that ground.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.